The Paris Massacre and the European Future: A Conversation with Mark Helprin

Play

Award-winning novelist Mark Helprin is also one of the most significant voices writing on American foreign policy. Liberty Law Talk interviews Mr. Helprin about the recent terrorist attacks in Paris and what they mean for France, the European Union, and the United States.

Mark Helprin

Mark Helprin is an award winning novelist whose works include six novels (Refiner's Fire, Winter's Tale, A Soldier of the Great War, Memoir From Antproof Case, Freddy and Fredericka and, In Sunlight and In Shadow), three collections of short stories (A Dove of the East and Other Stories, Ellis Island and Other Stories, and The Pacific and Other Stories), and three children's books (Swan Lake, A City in Winter, and The Veil of Snows). He has served in the British Merchant Navy, the Israeli infantry, and the Israeli Air Force. He was published in The New Yorker for almost a quarter of a century, and his stories and essays on politics and aesthetics appear in The Atlantic Monthly, The New Criterion, The Wall Street Journal, Commentary, The New York Times, The National Review, American Heritage, Forbes ASAP, and many other publications here and abroad.

About the Author

Recent Popular Posts

Related Posts

Comments

  1. James Cricquette says

    I’ve only today, December 2, 2015, come across your website because I followed a link from Mark Helprin’s site in order to listen what he had to say about Paris. I don’t know whether it is the norm, or whether your rules for your announcers are loose to a degree where you allow for them to editorialize, let alone during what is simply an introduction to your guest, but what almost made me turn the whole thing off was your announcer stating “he doesn’t know what he is talking about” in regards to not only President Obama’s statement about ISIS being contained, but his idea of the threat at all. I came to hear Helprin’s thoughts, which although I find I disagree with him more than not, I find engaging, thoughtful, and scholarly. I didn’t come to hear an interviewer tell me his sophomoric attitude towards one comment of the President, let alone taking it completely out of context. (That is to say, anyone giving the President the slightest break would understand that he meant in terms of the territory they hold, and even he would understand the more amorphous uncontained threat of unannounced terrorist activity. It was a very cheap shot by someone whose position should simply be to ask questions of the guest, not espouse opinions even before the guest has yet to speak. Please pass this along to him with my sincerest regards. Jim.

  2. Richard ReinschRichard Reinsch says

    James Cricquette, My comment mentioned that Obama had on the morning of the attack referred to ISIS as “contained” implying that it no longer constituted an growing threat to the West. I was referring to this comment and to other comments he has made about ISIS (“JV squad”), which have demonstrated to most observers that he downplays the true capabilities of this terrorist group. That an attack of immense proportions occurred the same day he made the aforementioned remark struck me and many others as an instance of irony and giving us further reason not to take his assessments at face value. Hardly sophormoric, but a considered judgment weighing evidence and the accumulation of statements by the President on ISIS that don’t equal reality.

    Moreover, to say that Obama’s comment only referred to territory that ISIS holds is to bend over backwards in order to find it accurate. ISIS is an organization that is about, per its own words, aggressive and expansive action against infidels utilizing any means necessary. Containing ISIS or making the observation that they are “contained” will require much more strenuous action against the organization before such a judgment could be made. Secondly, judging that ISIS is contained proper or assuming that they will gain no new territory is also, at this point, a more generous and hopeful prediction than I would make.

    • Thomas Wirth says

      Hi Richard,

      I understand your sentiment, but I think you must know that James was likely referring to your comment that the President “doesn’t know what he is talking about.” While you might not agree with the President, I’m pretty sure he has more information than any of us. What conclusion you might draw having that same information and his responsibilities is another conversation, but I have to agree that that comment in your introduction was unnecessary and somewhat inappropriate.

      Thanks for interviewing Mr. Helprin. I am a huge fan of his fiction. I wish you both the best.

  3. Richard ReinschRichard Reinsch says

    Thomas, It’s not sentiment, it’s logic and evidence. We judge political leaders by their actions and its consequences not as peasants and subjects. i.e., “He must have more information than me, therefore who am I to judge?”

    Did he have more evidence and credible evidence to support his earlier assertions and judgments about ISIS? He has consistently downplayed their power only to be shown in error days and weeks later. I reference again his statement that they ISIS was a “JV” terror front and then we watched over the next few months as they extended their territory over huge portions of Iraq and Syria. I know, right, he must have had more information than me.

    Did he have more evidence when he said that “Al-Qaeda is on the run” before we witnessed a resurgence of their power in the Libya attack and now their likely return to power in Afghanistan?

    Again, what do we see from the administration in the wake of an Islamic terrorist attack in California? He downplays and diverts from the origin and source of the attack, focusing instead on gun control.

    These are fundamentally political judgments he makes. ISIS can’t be a threat. Islamic terror can’t be a threat. Why? He judges that to embrace such a view is to put him on the wrong popular footing. No need for a very hesitant President if we face a renewed Islamic terror threat from various quarters and regions of the globe.

  4. Steve VT says

    Dear Mr. Reinsch,

    Your comment that the President “doesn’t know what he is talking about” seems charitable. That the President “has more information than any of us” makes his response even more troubling.

    Thank you for the interview. I have enjoyed all of the books by Mr. Helprin.

  5. Nicolas says

    Hi,

    Please allow me to express here my strong dislike of what was said in this talk. Everything you guys said was about fearmongering. The guest served in the Israeli Army, and calls Iran a terrorist state. Now Iran is definitely a terrible tyranny, but is Israel not as much of a terrorist state? I mean, the Israeli army has killed thousands of innocent Palestinian men and women and even children over the past decades. I refuse the highly emotional content this talk gives, it sounds all like Fox News. This kind of speeches only work on people that have no education, that do not question what they are told by people who support the wars because it first helps divert the population from the real economic issues that are far worse of threats, and second it enables the American corporations to sell weapons. Anyone who fails to notice this, I think, does not see what motivates these speeches.

    Also, I am French, how dare you say the refugees that came here were mostly young men? You are lying. The information you are giving your audience is wrong information, that aims to screw the uneducated masses’ worldview and make it easier for the powerful people to continue dominating the American people.

    Only talking about security, because you’re targetting what’s sensitive in people. How about you stimulate people’s brains and invite people like Noam Chomsy, Norman Finkielstein, Michael Moore, Mehdi Hasan, Tariq Ramadan, Russell Brand or others? I doubt you’re actually concerned about truth.

    I hope my critiques get a response, although I have no trust in you anymore.

    Sad fearmongering elites.
    We are all humans, regardless of race or religion. Stop hate. :-)

  6. Gary L. Holmes says

    Richard : You called it right from the Jump ! I loved the interview and you owe no apologe to anyone !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>