• About
  • Contact
  • Staff

Law & Liberty

A Project of Liberty Fund

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Liberty Law Forum
  • Podcasts
  • Book Reviews

January 9, 2017|Dhimmi, Islam, Jizya, Mideast Christians, Turkish Empire, Umma

The Complicated Political History of Mideast Christians

by Mark L. Movsesian|2 Comments

In my first post, I described the terrible conditions facing Mideast Christians today. I’d now like to explore the reasons for their current situation—which are many. To do so, though, I’ll have to step back to introduce these Christians, since most Americans know relatively little about them. I’ll also have to say a bit about their history since the Muslim conquests of the first millennium.

Most Mideast Christians belong to ancient communions which date from the founding of the faith. Most have been separated from Western churches, and from each other, for many centuries. Although the separations initially occurred over points of doctrine—sometimes quite recondite points of doctrine, by today’s lights—they were greatly influenced by culture and politics as well. The doctrinal differences have receded into the background for most people, especially for Mideast Christians themselves. There is much intermarriage and it is rare to hear churches formally criticize each other’s Christology, for example. But the cultural and political differences with the West remain; even today, Western Christians tend to see these groups as foreign and obscure—which is a pity, as they often have preserved very early traditions of the faith.

The first large group of Mideast Christians are the Oriental Orthodox, who separated from the West in the first major schism in Christianity, after the Council of Chalcedon in the fifth century: the Armenian, Coptic, and Syriac Orthodox Churches. The second are the more familiar Eastern Orthodox, which trace their heritage to the imperial church of Byzantium, and which separated from the West about 1000 years ago, in the Great Schism. In the Mideast, the Eastern Orthodox are mostly Arab-speaking Greek Orthodox Christians, whose patriarchate in Antioch has done much missionary work in the United States.

There are also Catholics. Predominantly, these are Eastern-rite Catholics, like the Chaldean, Maronite and Melkite Catholics, who use different liturgies from Catholics in the West. There are Latin-rite Catholics in the Mideast as well, though, like the Franciscans at the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. There are also smaller Christian communions, like the Assyrian Church of the East, which separated from the main body of Christianity in the fourth century, and which prevails in parts of Iraq. Finally, there is a small number of Evangelicals, a new addition to the Mideast, historically speaking.

For 12 to 14 centuries, the central fact of life for Mideast Christians has been adapting to Muslim-dominated societies. In classical Islamic law, Christians (and Jews) were tolerated as “People of the Book”—the recipients of an older, though from the Muslim perspective incomplete, revelation. Christians were allowed to live in Muslim society as long as they accepted the terms of the dhimma, a notional contract between them and the Muslim nation, or Umma. Christians were required to pay a poll tax called the jizya and to accept a subordinate place in society. In return, the Umma protected Christians from private violence and allowed them to worship more or less as they saw fit—as long as Christians did not proselytize among Muslims or insult Islam in any way.

The rules were not always fully observed in all places, and individual Christians could rise in classical Muslim society. For long periods, even, they could live in relative peace—though always in a state of insecurity. Periodically, though, Christians were subjected to violent persecution, for example, when they seemed to forget their place and assert equality with Muslims, or when they seemed to cooperate with Muslims’ outside enemies, especially Christians from the West.

The classical rules have not formally been in effect in the Mideast (with some exceptions) for at least 150 years, ever since the Ottoman Empire adopted Western-instigated reforms in the nineteenth century. Few Muslims would like to see the rules return; ISIS’s reinstatement of the dhimma in the parts of Syria and Iraq it controls is without precedent in modern times. And yet, the dhimmi restrictions and the attitudes they promote remain relevant for Mideast Christians today. I’ll take up that matter in my next post.

Mark L. Movsesian

Mark L. Movsesian is Frederick A. Whitney Professor and Director of the Center for Law and Religion at St. John’s University Law School. He is currently a James Madison Program Visiting Fellow at Princeton University​.

About the Author

History’s Fickle Judgment
National Sovereignty, Political Idea of the Year

Recent Popular Posts

  • Popular
  • Today Week Month All
  • Superman and the Drive-By Media April 20, 2018
  • Chappaquiddick Rescues the Truth: Kopechne Needn’t Have Died April 20, 2018
  • Reading the State of Britain with Roger Scruton April 19, 2018
  • Explaining the New Illiberal Liberalism April 18, 2018
  • The Constitution and Executive Privilege July 12, 2012
Ajax spinner

Related Posts

Related

Comments

  1. Aram Hagopian says

    January 9, 2017 at 8:59 am

    There was a protestant movement ,albeit small, in western Armenia since the mid 19th century.

    Reply
  2. gabe says

    January 9, 2017 at 11:01 am

    Mr. Movsesian is being too kind to the UMMA. His depiction of the dhimma may lead one to conclude that Middle Eastern Christians had only to contend with some minor inconveniences. I recognize space does not allow for a full description of the oppressive nature of Islamic rule but still…

    For a somewhat more complete picture of the conditions under which M.E. Christians had to live see any of the writings of Bat Ye’Or, to cite just one alternate perspective / history.

    Yet, Movsesian is correct in this regard. Many Christians during the reign of certain Muslim rulers DID rise to prominence. Indeed, so much of the “vaunted” Islamic contribution to the arts, science and medicine was actually the work of Coptic, Nestorian, Assyriac and other Christians. (There used to be a site called Ninevah on Line that had some rather interesting info on this – but it appears to be defunct – much like the “beneficient” Muslim administration of Christian citizens in todays Middle East).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Book Reviews

John C. Calhoun, Madisonian Manqué

by Thomas W. Merrill

His institutional innovations were geared toward preserving slavery.

Read More

The Road to Iranian Democracy

by Luma Simms

The suppression of the Green Movement last time around widened the gulf between Iran’s elite and its people.

Read More

Podcasts

The Solid Ground of Mere Civility: A Conversation with Teresa Bejan

A discussion with Teresa M. Bejan

Teresa Bejan discusses with us how early modern debates over religious toleration are an example of how we can disagree well.

Read More

Leading a Worthy Life in a Scattered Time: A Conversation with Leon Kass

A discussion with Leon Kass

Leon Kass discusses Leading a Worthy Life.

Read More

Eric Voegelin Studies: A Conversation with Charles Embry

A discussion with Charles Embry

What did “Don’t immanentize the eschaton!” really mean? An intro podcast on the formidable mind of Eric Voegelin.

Read More

Republican Virtue, Interrupted: A Conversation with Frank Buckley

A discussion with F.H. Buckley

The real conflict in our politics centers on reforming massive levels of public corruption.

Read More

Recent Posts

  • Chappaquiddick Rescues the Truth: Kopechne Needn’t Have Died

    Mary Jo Kopechne perished not because Ted Kennedy crashed his car, but because the legacy was more important than telling the authorities she was in it.
    by Nathaniel Peters

  • Superman and the Drive-By Media

    Prime territory for Clark Kent to investigate: the biased and superficial work done by our most prominent journalists.
    by Mark Judge

  • Partisan Gerrymandering and The Original Meaning of “Election”

    States are responsible for the nature of elections: without a strong historical argument to the contrary, partisan gerrymandering is constitutional.
    by Mike Rappaport

  • Reading the State of Britain with Roger Scruton

    In Where We Are, Roger Scruton helps us see Britain's possible futures, but the question remains: is he pessimistic enough?
    by Theodore Dalrymple

  • Is Partisan Gerrymandering of Congressional Elections Unconstitutional Under the Original Meaning?

    Professor Ned Foley argues that the Constitution limits congressional gerrymandering. Why is this?
    by Mike Rappaport

Blogroll

  • Acton PowerBlog
  • Cafe Hayek
  • Cato@Liberty
  • Claremont
  • Congress Shall Make No Law
  • EconLog
  • Fed Soc Blog
  • First Things
  • Hoover
  • ISI First Principles Journal
  • Legal Theory Blog
  • Marginal Revolution
  • Pacific Legal Liberty Blog
  • Point of Law
  • Power Line
  • Professor Bainbridge
  • Ricochet
  • Right Reason
  • Spengler
  • The American
  • The Beacon Blog
  • The Foundry
  • The Originalism Blog
  • The Public Discourse
  • University Bookman
  • Via Meadia
  • Volokh

Archives

  • All Posts & Publications
  • Book Reviews
  • Liberty Forum
  • Liberty Law Blog
  • Liberty Law Talk

About

Law and Liberty’s focus is on the content, status, and development of law in the context of republican and limited government and the ways that liberty and law and law and liberty mutually reinforce the other. This site brings together serious debate, commentary, essays, book reviews, interviews, and educational material in a commitment to the first principles of law in a free society. Law and Liberty considers a range of foundational and contemporary legal issues, legal philosophy, and pedagogy.

  • Home
  • About
  • Staff
  • Contact
  • Archive

Apple App Store
Google Play Store

© 2018 Liberty Fund, Inc.

Subscribe
Get Law and Liberty's latest content delivered to you daily
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
No thanks