Recently, Mike Ramsey discussed the letter of a host of distinguished scholars arguing that the Constitution requires that a majority of each house have the power to change its rules (at least on the first day of the legislative session). …
James Stoner’s essay on the common law and the constitution provides a very valuable perspective on our founding document. Stoner is wholly correct that the common law concepts are often essential to interpreting the Constitution. Nevertheless, I want to raise …
It is a pleasure to comment on Sandy Levinson’s Jeffersonian Proposal for the Constitution (as well as on Richard Epstein’s brief comment on it). I find myself somewhere in the middle in this debate. I agree with Sandy that our …
Jonathan Adler notes that the New York Times has changed its position on filibusters of appointees:
It is time to end the ability of a single senator, or group of senators, to block the confirmation process by threatening a filibuster,
…
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
Email